Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1e35/d1e35d4db08406192ef5259cbc0a65a35d691288" alt="Canon PowerShot S95 front Canon PowerShot S95 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Launched November 2010
- Older Model is Canon S90
- Later Model is Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below is a extensive review of the Canon S95 versus Ricoh WG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the S95 (10MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the S95 (1/1.7") and WG-4 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The S95 was brought out 4 years prior to the WG-4 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the S95 grades against the WG-4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot S95 and Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are available at Canon S95 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Ricoh WG-4
S95 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Canon S95
WG-4 | S95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | ![]() | November 2010 | More recent by 39 months |
Common features in the Canon S95 and Ricoh WG-4
S95 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon S95 has exterior measurements of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Canon S95 versus Ricoh WG-4 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the S95 versus the WG-4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c73b/5c73b2bb6c3364a0d5b1aea6a7057d78a4c60b38" alt="Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S95 and WG-4 is 93 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd6e9/fd6e9e86b8d7f822fb4092da5bd8e644dd9d2665" alt="Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison"
Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading specs. The visual here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the S95 and WG-4.
As you can plainly see, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The S95 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Ricoh WG-4 will offer extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older S95 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60947/60947d57ee573492cd525b061a3a417e6f33f8e7" alt="Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison"
Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2be8/b2be831cdc4b50ec8933de798a7fbb35446c9367" alt="Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
Canon PowerShot S95 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Ricoh |
Model type | Canon PowerShot S95 | Ricoh WG-4 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2010-11-23 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 4 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.50 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/500 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 195 gr (0.43 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 153 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-6L | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | - | One |
Price at release | $495 | $330 |