Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1e35/d1e35d4db08406192ef5259cbc0a65a35d691288" alt="Canon PowerShot S95 front Canon PowerShot S95 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Announced November 2010
- Replaced the Canon S90
- Refreshed by Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Canon S95 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the S95 (10MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the S95 (1/1.7") and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The S95 was released 4 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the S95 matches up vs the WG-4 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot S95 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon S95 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
S95 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Canon S95
WG-4 GPS | S95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | ![]() | November 2010 | Fresher by 39 months |
Common features in the Canon S95 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
S95 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon S95 has got outer dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") having a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Canon S95 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the S95 vs the WG-4 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0bbe/d0bbecf093b40ff183a12235f4818817f0b713e3" alt="Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S95 and WG-4 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13675/136755c46f8db65ce3c52461a199cfbafd4048de" alt="Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by reviewing specs. The photograph below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the S95 and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The S95 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The older S95 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8085b/8085b15d633db2be4f4ce00e4f7f5cfd635b4f80" alt="Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison"
Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d140/0d140464124ec54b09c2c6f1369a3e923dda34ec" alt="Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon S95 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Canon PowerShot S95 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon PowerShot S95 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2010-11-23 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 4 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.50 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/500 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 195 gr (0.43 pounds) | 235 gr (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 47 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 153 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-6L | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | - | Single |
Retail cost | $495 | $210 |