Canon S95 vs Samsung WB700
93 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Canon S95 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
- Announced November 2010
- Succeeded the Canon S90
- New Model is Canon S100
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched December 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon S95 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Canon S95 versus Samsung WB700, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Canon and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the S95 (10MP) and WB700 (14MP) and the S95 (1/1.7") and WB700 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S95 was manufactured around the same time to the WB700 so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the S95 grades against the WB700 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon S95 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot S95 & Samsung WB700. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon S95 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Samsung WB700
| S95 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Canon S95
| WB700 | S95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k | 461k | Clearer screen (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Canon S95 and Samsung WB700
| S95 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2010 | December 2010 | Similar age | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Canon S95 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon S95 has got outside dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") along with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Samsung WB700 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Canon S95 versus Samsung WB700 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the S95 against the WB700.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the S95 and WB700 is 93 and 98 respectively.
Canon S95 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S95 and WB700.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The S95 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Samsung WB700 will offer more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively.
Canon S95 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon S95 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot S95 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot S95 | Samsung WB700 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-11-23 | 2010-12-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/500s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 195 gr (0.43 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 47 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 153 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card | - |
| Card slots | - | Single |
| Price at launch | $495 | $300 |