Clicky

Canon S95 vs Sony W220

Portability
93
Imaging
34
Features
42
Overall
37
Canon PowerShot S95 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 front
Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
17
Overall
27

Canon S95 vs Sony W220 Key Specs

Canon S95
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-105mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 195g - 100 x 58 x 30mm
  • Released November 2010
  • Replaced the Canon S90
  • Replacement is Canon S100
Sony W220
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
  • 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Released January 2009
Photography Glossary

Canon S95 vs Sony W220 Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Canon S95 vs Sony W220, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Canon and Sony. The sensor resolution of the S95 (10MP) and the W220 (12MP) is fairly comparable but the S95 (1/1.7") and W220 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The S95 was introduced 23 months later than the W220 making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the S95 scores against the W220 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon S95 over the Sony W220

 S95 W220 
ReleasedNovember 2010January 2009Fresher by 23 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution461k230kCrisper display (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Canon S95

 W220 S95 

Common features in the Canon S95 and Sony W220

 S95 W220 
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Canon S95 vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Canon S95 offers outer dimensions of 100mm x 58mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony W220 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).

Analyze the Canon S95 vs Sony W220 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the S95 against the W220.

Canon S95 vs Sony W220 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S95 and W220 is 93 and 95 respectively.

Canon S95 vs Sony W220 top view buttons comparison

Canon S95 vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing just by going through a spec sheet. The visual here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the S95 and W220.

Clearly, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The S95 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Sony W220 will provide more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent S95 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Canon S95 vs Sony W220 sensor size comparison

Canon S95 vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon S95 vs Sony W220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon S95 Portrait photography advice
Sony W220 Portrait photography advice
40
focusing manually
above average flash sync speed (1/500 seconds)
saves RAW files
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
27
manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Canon S95 Street photography factors
Sony W220 Street photography factors
65
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
56
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Canon S95 Sports photography features
Sony W220 Sports photography features
27
image stabilization (Optical)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 fps)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect AF
25
image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Canon S95 Travel photography highlights
Sony W220 Travel photography highlights
64
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
lack of Timelapse recording
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
51
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (30mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Canon S95 Landscape photography features
Sony W220 Landscape photography features
52
focusing manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
lack of Timelapse recording
32
manual focus
image stabilization (Optical)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (30mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Canon S95 as a Vlogging camera
Sony W220 as a Vlogging camera
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Optical)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone port
25
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (30mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon S95 vs Sony W220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon S95 and Sony W220
 Canon PowerShot S95Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
General Information
Make Canon Sony
Model Canon PowerShot S95 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2010-11-23 2009-01-08
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Digic 4 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-105mm (3.8x) 30-120mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/2.8-7.1
Macro focus range 5cm 5cm
Crop factor 4.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 461k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 secs 1 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1600 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 6.50 m 7.10 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/500 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 195g (0.43 pounds) 147g (0.32 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 58 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 47 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 153 not tested
Other
Battery model NB-6L -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus card Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots - 1
Price at launch $495 $160