Canon SD4000 IS vs Ricoh WG-70
94 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Canon SD4000 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-5.3) lens
- 175g - 100 x 54 x 23mm
- Revealed August 2010
- Alternative Name is IXUS 300 HS / IXY 30S
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- New Model is Ricoh WG-80
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SD4000 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Canon SD4000 IS and Ricoh WG-70, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the SD4000 IS (10MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SD4000 IS was manufactured 10 years earlier than the WG-70 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple summation of how the SD4000 IS grades versus the WG-70 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SD4000 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SD4000 IS and Ricoh WG-70. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SD4000 IS Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SD4000 IS over the Ricoh WG-70
| SD4000 IS | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Canon SD4000 IS
| WG-70 | SD4000 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 115 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Canon SD4000 IS and Ricoh WG-70
| SD4000 IS | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Canon SD4000 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Canon SD4000 IS features physical dimensions of 100mm x 54mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.1" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Canon SD4000 IS and Ricoh WG-70 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the SD4000 IS compared to the WG-70.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SD4000 IS and WG-70 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Canon SD4000 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specifications. The image below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SD4000 IS and WG-70.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-70 to provide greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged SD4000 IS will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SD4000 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SD4000 IS vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SD4000 IS | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SD4000 IS | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Also referred to as | IXUS 300 HS / IXY 30S | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-08-02 | 2020-02-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-5.3 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 54 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $280 |