Canon SD4500 IS vs Olympus 9000
94 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Canon SD4500 IS vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 36-360mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 190g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Alternative Name is Digital IXUS 1000 HS / IXY 50S
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon SD4500 IS vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Canon SD4500 IS and Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the SD4500 IS (10MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is pretty close and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SD4500 IS was released 2 years later than the 9000 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the SD4500 IS scores against the 9000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SD4500 IS vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SD4500 IS and Olympus Stylus 9000. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SD4500 IS Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SD4500 IS over the Olympus 9000
| SD4500 IS | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 |  | May 2009 | Fresher by 27 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Canon SD4500 IS
| 9000 | SD4500 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SD4500 IS and Olympus 9000
| SD4500 IS | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Canon SD4500 IS vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SD4500 IS provides outside measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Canon SD4500 IS and Olympus 9000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the SD4500 IS compared to the 9000.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SD4500 IS and 9000 is 94 and 92 respectively.
Canon SD4500 IS vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing purely by looking through technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SD4500 IS and 9000.
As you have seen, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus 9000 to provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The newer SD4500 IS should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Canon SD4500 IS vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon SD4500 IS vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SD4500 IS | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SD4500 IS | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Otherwise known as | Digital IXUS 1000 HS / IXY 50S | mju 9000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-360mm (10.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 225g (0.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-9L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $300 |
