Canon SD780 IS vs Casio EX-Z35
96 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
![Canon PowerShot SD780 IS front Canon PowerShot SD780 IS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Canon-PowerShot-SD780-IS.jpg)
![Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35/Casio-EX-Z35-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Canon SD780 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 33-100mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 155g - 87 x 56 x 18mm
- Announced February 2009
- Other Name is Digital IXUS 100 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Canon SD780 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Canon SD780 IS versus Casio EX-Z35, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Canon and Casio. The image resolution of the SD780 IS (12MP) and the EX-Z35 (12MP) is very comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The SD780 IS was released 12 months prior to the EX-Z35 and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summary of how the SD780 IS matches up vs the EX-Z35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Canon SD780 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SD780 IS & Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SD780 IS Gallery & Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SD780 IS over the Casio EX-Z35
SD780 IS | EX-Z35 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Canon SD780 IS
EX-Z35 | SD780 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2010 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 12 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Canon SD780 IS and Casio EX-Z35
SD780 IS | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 2.5" | ![]() | 2.5" | Equivalent display sizing |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Canon SD780 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon SD780 IS comes with outer dimensions of 87mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.4" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Casio EX-Z35 has dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Canon SD780 IS versus Casio EX-Z35 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the SD780 IS vs the EX-Z35.
![Canon SD780 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 size comparison Canon SD780 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SD780-IS-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SD780 IS and EX-Z35 is 96 and 96 respectively.
![Canon SD780 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 top view buttons comparison Canon SD780 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SD780-IS-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon SD780 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing specifications. The photograph here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SD780 IS and EX-Z35.
Plainly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of images though you will want to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The older SD780 IS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
![Canon SD780 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 sensor size comparison Canon SD780 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SD780-IS-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon SD780 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon SD780 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SD780 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SD780-IS-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Canon SD780 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SD780 IS | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Casio |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SD780 IS | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
Otherwise known as | Digital IXUS 100 IS | - |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-02-18 | 2010-02-21 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 33-100mm (3.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (tunnel) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 87 x 56 x 18mm (3.4" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NB-4L | NP-82 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/HD MMCplus | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $0 | $99 |