Canon SD940 IS vs Olympus TG-870
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8238b/8238b11bcfb7a735d5316523fe8cb3cd6de8164b" alt="Canon PowerShot SD940 IS front Canon PowerShot SD940 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Canon SD940 IS vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 120g - 89 x 55 x 20mm
- Launched August 2009
- Additionally referred to as Digital IXUS 120 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Old Model is Olympus TG-860
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SD940 IS vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Canon SD940 IS and Olympus TG-870, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the SD940 IS (12MP) and TG-870 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The SD940 IS was launched 7 years earlier than the TG-870 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the SD940 IS grades vs the TG-870 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon SD940 IS vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SD940 IS and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The complete galleries are available at Canon SD940 IS Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SD940 IS over the Olympus TG-870
SD940 IS | TG-870 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Canon SD940 IS
TG-870 | SD940 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | ![]() | August 2009 | More modern by 77 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SD940 IS and Olympus TG-870
SD940 IS | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Canon SD940 IS vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon SD940 IS has physical dimensions of 89mm x 55mm x 20mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Canon SD940 IS and Olympus TG-870 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the SD940 IS versus the TG-870.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f330a/f330a812aa1d2fd43d6e78287478449e43598854" alt="Canon SD940 IS vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison Canon SD940 IS vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SD940 IS and TG-870 is 96 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d3e1/8d3e195c7d1fb94a264255062a7b96f937742524" alt="Canon SD940 IS vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison Canon SD940 IS vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SD940 IS vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through specifications. The pic here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SD940 IS and TG-870.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus TG-870 to render more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged SD940 IS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b417/3b4179f2edd4afb2ac4573cb831a45f4b115ca59" alt="Canon SD940 IS vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison Canon SD940 IS vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison"
Canon SD940 IS vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00f88/00f888c0ceb1fe80c67977a84d1753149ffdf744" alt="Canon SD940 IS vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SD940 IS vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon SD940 IS vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SD940 IS | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot SD940 IS | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Also called | Digital IXUS 120 IS | - |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-08-19 | 2016-01-06 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 4 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 120 gr (0.26 lb) | 221 gr (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 89 x 55 x 20mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-4L | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, MMC, MMCplus, HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $299 | $280 |