Canon SX1 IS vs Casio EX-Z35
64 Imaging
33 Features
53 Overall
41
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Canon SX1 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 615g - 128 x 88 x 88mm
- Introduced March 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
Canon SX1 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Canon SX1 IS vs Casio EX-Z35, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Casio. The image resolution of the SX1 IS (10MP) and the EX-Z35 (12MP) is very well matched and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX1 IS was manufactured 11 months earlier than the EX-Z35 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Canon SX1 IS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the SX1 IS scores vs the EX-Z35 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Canon SX1 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX1 IS and Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX1 IS Gallery and Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX1 IS over the Casio EX-Z35
SX1 IS | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 2.8" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Canon SX1 IS
EX-Z35 | SX1 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2010 | March 2009 | Fresher by 11 months |
Common features in the Canon SX1 IS and Casio EX-Z35
SX1 IS | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
Touch display | No Touch display |
Canon SX1 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you need to think about its weight and size. The Canon SX1 IS features physical dimensions of 128mm x 88mm x 88mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 615 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Casio EX-Z35 has specifications of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX1 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the SX1 IS against the EX-Z35.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX1 IS and EX-Z35 is 64 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX1 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX1 IS and EX-Z35.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should expect to see the Casio EX-Z35 to give extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older SX1 IS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX1 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX1 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX1 IS | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Casio |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX1 IS | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-03-27 | 2010-02-21 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-560mm (20.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 0cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.8 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | 3.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/500 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 615 gr (1.36 lb) | 124 gr (0.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 128 x 88 x 88mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.5") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | NP-82 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec or custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $600 | $99 |