Canon SX1 IS vs Nikon S9900
64 Imaging
32 Features
53 Overall
40
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Canon SX1 IS vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 615g - 128 x 88 x 88mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Released February 2015
- Previous Model is Nikon S9700
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX1 IS vs Nikon S9900 Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Canon SX1 IS vs Nikon S9900, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and Nikon. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the SX1 IS (10MP) and S9900 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX1 IS was launched 6 years earlier than the S9900 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Canon SX1 IS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S9900 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the SX1 IS grades versus the S9900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX1 IS vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX1 IS & Nikon Coolpix S9900. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX1 IS Gallery & Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX1 IS over the Nikon S9900
| SX1 IS | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Canon SX1 IS
| S9900 | SX1 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 | March 2009 | Newer by 71 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX1 IS and Nikon S9900
| SX1 IS | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
| Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Canon SX1 IS vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon SX1 IS has outer dimensions of 128mm x 88mm x 88mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 615 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Nikon S9900 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX1 IS vs Nikon S9900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the SX1 IS compared to the S9900.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX1 IS and S9900 is 64 and 88 respectively.
Canon SX1 IS vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by looking at technical specs. The image here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX1 IS and S9900.
As you can tell, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the Nikon S9900 to give you extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged SX1 IS is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Canon SX1 IS vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX1 IS vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX1 IS | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Nikon |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX1 IS | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-03-27 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-560mm (20.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.7-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 2.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/500 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 615 grams (1.36 lbs) | 289 grams (0.64 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 128 x 88 x 88mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.5") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec or custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $600 | $300 |