Canon SX10 IS vs Pentax WG-10
65 Imaging
32 Features
39 Overall
34
93 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
Canon SX10 IS vs Pentax WG-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 600g - 128 x 88 x 87mm
- Launched January 2009
- Later Model is Canon SX20 IS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
Photography Glossary Canon SX10 IS vs Pentax WG-10 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Canon SX10 IS and Pentax WG-10, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Pentax. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX10 IS (10MP) and WG-10 (14MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX10 IS was announced 5 years prior to the WG-10 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX10 IS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Pentax WG-10 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the SX10 IS grades versus the WG-10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX10 IS vs Pentax WG-10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX10 IS & Pentax WG-10. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX10 IS Gallery & Pentax WG-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX10 IS over the Pentax WG-10
| SX10 IS | WG-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-10 over the Canon SX10 IS
| WG-10 | SX10 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 53 months | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Canon SX10 IS and Pentax WG-10
| SX10 IS | WG-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Canon SX10 IS vs Pentax WG-10 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX10 IS enjoys physical dimensions of 128mm x 88mm x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-10 has dimensions of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX10 IS and Pentax WG-10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the SX10 IS vs the WG-10.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the SX10 IS and WG-10 is 65 and 93 respectively.
Canon SX10 IS vs Pentax WG-10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by researching technical specs. The image here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX10 IS and WG-10.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Pentax WG-10 to result in greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged SX10 IS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX10 IS vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon SX10 IS vs Pentax WG-10 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX10 IS | Pentax WG-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Pentax |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX10 IS | Pentax WG-10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-15 | 2013-06-21 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-560mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 0.7 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | 1.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/500s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 600 grams (1.32 lbs) | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 128 x 88 x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec or custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $275 | $0 |