Canon SX10 IS vs Ricoh GR III
65 Imaging
33 Features
39 Overall
35


90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65
Canon SX10 IS vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 600g - 128 x 88 x 87mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Replacement is Canon SX20 IS
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Announced September 2018
- Older Model is Ricoh GR III
- Replacement is Ricoh GR III

Canon SX10 IS vs Ricoh GR III Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Canon SX10 IS versus Ricoh GR III, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the SX10 IS (10MP) and GR III (24MP) and the SX10 IS (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.

The SX10 IS was released 10 years earlier than the GR III and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX10 IS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the SX10 IS matches up vs the GR III with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Canon SX10 IS vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX10 IS & Ricoh GR III. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX10 IS Gallery & Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX10 IS over the Ricoh GR III
SX10 IS | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Canon SX10 IS
GR III | SX10 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 118 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX10 IS and Ricoh GR III
SX10 IS | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Canon SX10 IS vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Canon SX10 IS provides outer dimensions of 128mm x 88mm x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR III has sizing of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX10 IS versus Ricoh GR III in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the SX10 IS against the GR III.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX10 IS and GR III is 65 and 90 respectively.

Canon SX10 IS vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing only by reading through technical specs. The visual underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SX10 IS and GR III.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SX10 IS because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Ricoh GR III will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 14MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The older SX10 IS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Canon SX10 IS vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX10 IS vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX10 IS | Ricoh GR III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX10 IS | Ricoh GR III |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-01-15 | 2018-09-25 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-560mm (20.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2.8-16 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | 6cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/500 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 600g (1.32 pounds) | 257g (0.57 pounds) |
Dimensions | 128 x 88 x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec or custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC card | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $275 | $900 |