Canon SX10 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1
65 Imaging
33 Features
39 Overall
35
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Canon SX10 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 600g - 128 x 88 x 87mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Refreshed by Canon SX20 IS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX10 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Canon SX10 IS and Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the SX10 IS (10MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SX10 IS was brought out 6 years before the WG-M1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX10 IS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the SX10 IS grades vs the WG-M1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX10 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX10 IS & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX10 IS Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX10 IS over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SX10 IS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen size | 2.5" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Canon SX10 IS
| WG-M1 | SX10 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 68 months |
Common features in the Canon SX10 IS and Ricoh WG-M1
| SX10 IS | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX10 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Canon SX10 IS provides outer dimensions of 128mm x 88mm x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Canon SX10 IS and Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the SX10 IS vs the WG-M1.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SX10 IS and WG-M1 is 65 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX10 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SX10 IS and WG-M1.
As you can see, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to offer you more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The older SX10 IS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon SX10 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX10 IS vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX10 IS | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX10 IS | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-01-15 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-560mm (20.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/500 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 600 gr (1.32 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 128 x 88 x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec or custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/MMC card | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $275 | $2,000 |