Canon SX10 IS vs Samsung WB800F
65 Imaging
32 Features
39 Overall
34
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Canon SX10 IS vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 600g - 128 x 88 x 87mm
- Launched January 2009
- Refreshed by Canon SX20 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX10 IS vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Here, we are comparing the Canon SX10 IS and Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Canon and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the SX10 IS (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX10 IS was released 5 years prior to the WB800F which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX10 IS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the SX10 IS matches up vs the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX10 IS vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX10 IS & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX10 IS Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX10 IS over the Samsung WB800F
| SX10 IS | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Canon SX10 IS
| WB800F | SX10 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX10 IS and Samsung WB800F
| SX10 IS | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing |
Canon SX10 IS vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Canon SX10 IS provides outside dimensions of 128mm x 88mm x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") and a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX10 IS and Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the SX10 IS versus the WB800F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX10 IS and WB800F is 65 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX10 IS vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes just by reading through specs. The picture underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX10 IS and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung WB800F to resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged SX10 IS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX10 IS vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX10 IS vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX10 IS | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX10 IS | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-01-15 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-560mm (20.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/500s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 600g (1.32 lb) | 218g (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 128 x 88 x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec or custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $275 | $300 |