Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4
87 Imaging
33 Features
28 Overall
31
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-360mm (F2.8-4.3) lens
- 285g - 111 x 71 x 45mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the SX120 IS (10MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the SX120 IS (1/2.5") and WG-4 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe SX120 IS was announced 5 years before the WG-4 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the SX120 IS matches up versus the WG-4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX120 IS & Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX120 IS Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX120 IS over the Ricoh WG-4
| SX120 IS | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Canon SX120 IS
| WG-4 | SX120 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 54 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX120 IS and Ricoh WG-4
| SX120 IS | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Canon SX120 IS offers external dimensions of 111mm x 71mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") with a weight of 285 grams (0.63 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the SX120 IS versus the WG-4.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SX120 IS and WG-4 is 87 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing only by going over a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX120 IS and WG-4.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SX120 IS with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 will offer you extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older SX120 IS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX120 IS | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX120 IS | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-08-19 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-360mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.3 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2500s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/500s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 160 x 120 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 285 grams (0.63 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 71 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, MMC, MMCplus, HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $249 | $330 |
