Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4
87 Imaging
33 Features
28 Overall
31
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-360mm (F2.8-4.3) lens
- 285g - 111 x 71 x 45mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the SX120 IS (10MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the SX120 IS (1/2.5") and WG-4 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX120 IS was announced 5 years before the WG-4 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the SX120 IS matches up versus the WG-4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX120 IS & Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX120 IS Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX120 IS over the Ricoh WG-4
| SX120 IS | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Canon SX120 IS
| WG-4 | SX120 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 54 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX120 IS and Ricoh WG-4
| SX120 IS | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Canon SX120 IS offers external dimensions of 111mm x 71mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") with a weight of 285 grams (0.63 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the SX120 IS versus the WG-4.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SX120 IS and WG-4 is 87 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing only by going over a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX120 IS and WG-4.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SX120 IS with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 will offer you extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older SX120 IS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX120 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX120 IS | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX120 IS | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-08-19 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-360mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.3 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2500s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/500s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 160 x 120 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 285 grams (0.63 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 71 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, MMC, MMCplus, HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $249 | $330 |