Canon SX130 IS vs FujiFilm F300EXR

Here is a comprehensive assessment of the Canon SX130 IS vs FujiFilm F300EXR, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Canon and FujiFilm. The resolution of the SX130 IS (12MP) and the F300EXR (12MP) is fairly close but the SX130 IS (1/2.3") and F300EXR (1/2") provide different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The SX130 IS was introduced very close to the F300EXR so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the SX130 IS matches up vs the F300EXR in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX130 IS & FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX130 IS Gallery & FujiFilm F300EXR Gallery.

If you're intending to carry your camera, you have to think about its weight and size. The Canon SX130 IS offers outside dimensions of 113mm x 73mm x 46mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 308 grams (0.68 lbs) while the FujiFilm F300EXR has specifications of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).

Check the Canon SX130 IS vs FujiFilm F300EXR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the SX130 IS compared to the F300EXR.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SX130 IS and F300EXR is 85 and 91 respectively.

Often, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing simply by researching a spec sheet. The graphic here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX130 IS and F300EXR.

As you can see, each of these cameras have the same MP but different sensor sizing. The SX130 IS includes the smaller sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult.