Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
Portability
85 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
85 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
Canon SX130 IS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 308g - 113 x 73 x 46mm
- Released August 2010
- Renewed by Canon SX150 IS
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Lets look much closer at the Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the SX130 IS (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is very close and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX130 IS was brought out 17 months prior to the TG-820 iHS making them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the SX130 IS scores versus the TG-820 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX130 IS & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX130 IS Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX130 IS over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| SX130 IS | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Canon SX130 IS
| TG-820 iHS | SX130 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 17 months |
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX130 IS and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| SX130 IS | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX130 IS has outer measurements of 113mm x 73mm x 46mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.8") with a weight of 308 grams (0.68 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the SX130 IS compared to the TG-820 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SX130 IS and TG-820 iHS is 85 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing specifications. The photograph below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SX130 IS and TG-820 iHS.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP and you can expect comparable quality of files however you have to factor the age of the cameras into account. The older SX130 IS will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX130 IS Portrait photography factors
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography factors
has manual focus
external flash not possible
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
includes face detect focus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Canon SX130 IS Street photography advice
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography advice
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (308 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon SX130 IS
Sports photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
has image stabilization (Optical)
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking focus
environment sealing
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (220 per charge)
lack of phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Canon SX130 IS Travel photography advice
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography advice
lighter than average (308g)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
long reach (336mm)
no Time Lapse mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
environment sealing
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
terrible battery pack (220 CIPA)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Canon SX130 IS as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
has manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
pretty wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual exposure not available
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
terrible battery pack (220 shots)
lack of Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Canon SX130 IS Vlogging highlights
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging highlights
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (308g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic socket
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone jack
Photography Glossary
Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX130 IS | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX130 IS | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-08-19 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 4 | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,030 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 160 x 120 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 308 grams (0.68 pounds) | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 73 x 46mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.8") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $250 | $500 |