Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
85 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 308g - 113 x 73 x 46mm
- Released August 2010
- Refreshed by Canon SX150 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Canon SX130 IS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the SX130 IS (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively close but the SX130 IS (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX130 IS was revealed 3 years before the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the SX130 IS scores against the XZ-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX130 IS & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are available at Canon SX130 IS Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX130 IS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| SX130 IS | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Canon SX130 IS
| XZ-2 iHS | SX130 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 | August 2010 | Fresher by 28 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX130 IS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| SX130 IS | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX130 IS features external measurements of 113mm x 73mm x 46mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.8") with a weight of 308 grams (0.68 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX130 IS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the SX130 IS vs the XZ-2 iHS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX130 IS and XZ-2 iHS is 85 and 85 respectively.
Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through specifications. The graphic here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SX130 IS and XZ-2 iHS.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature the identical megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizing. The SX130 IS offers the smaller sensor which is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher. The older SX130 IS will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon SX130 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX130 IS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX130 IS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-08-19 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2500s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 160 x 120 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 308g (0.68 pounds) | 346g (0.76 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 73 x 46mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.8") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HC MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $250 | $450 |