Canon SX150 IS vs Ricoh WG-4
Portability
86 Imaging
37 Features
40 Overall
38
86 Imaging
37 Features
40 Overall
38
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Canon SX150 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
Canon SX150 IS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 306g - 113 x 73 x 46mm
- Released May 2012
- Previous Model is Canon SX130 IS
- Successor is Canon SX160 IS
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX150 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Canon SX150 IS vs Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SX150 IS (14MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX150 IS was released 21 months earlier than the WG-4 which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the SX150 IS grades against the WG-4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Canon SX150 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX150 IS & Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX150 IS Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX150 IS over the Ricoh WG-4
| SX150 IS | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Canon SX150 IS
| WG-4 | SX150 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | May 2012 | Fresher by 21 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX150 IS and Ricoh WG-4
| SX150 IS | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX150 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Canon SX150 IS has got outside dimensions of 113mm x 73mm x 46mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.8") with a weight of 306 grams (0.67 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX150 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the SX150 IS and the WG-4.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SX150 IS and WG-4 is 86 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX150 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to see the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The graphic below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX150 IS and WG-4.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-4 to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older SX150 IS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Canon SX150 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX150 IS Portrait photography advice
Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography advice
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
includes face detect focus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
offers face detect autofocus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Canon SX150 IS Street photography information
Ricoh WG-4 Street photography information
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (306g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon SX150 IS
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-4
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
low fps (1.0 fps)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low battery (130 shots)
no phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
offers tracking focus
environment proof
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low battery pack (240 CIPA)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Canon SX150 IS as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than others in class (306 grams)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
very long reach (336mm)
missing Timelapse mode
low battery (130 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
environment proof
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
low battery pack (240 shots)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon SX150 IS
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-4
has manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
low battery (130 shots)
missing Timelapse mode
has manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
environment proof
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
low battery pack (240 per charge)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Canon SX150 IS Vlogging info
Ricoh WG-4 Vlogging info
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focus
lighter than others in class (306 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone jack
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon SX150 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX150 IS | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX150 IS | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-05-14 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 1 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 160 x 120 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 306 gr (0.67 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 73 x 46mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 130 photos | 240 photos |
| Form of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $249 | $330 |