Canon SX160 IS vs Canon SX240 HS
Portability
86 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
86 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
91 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Canon SX160 IS vs Canon SX240 HS Key Specs
Canon SX160 IS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-448mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 291g - 111 x 73 x 44mm
- Released June 2013
- Older Model is Canon SX150 IS
- Newer Model is Canon SX170 IS
Canon SX240 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.8) lens
- 224g - 106 x 61 x 33mm
- Announced February 2012
- Succeeded the Canon SX230 HS
- Successor is Canon SX260 HS
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX160 IS vs Canon SX240 HS Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Canon SX160 IS and Canon SX240 HS, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras and both are created by Canon. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the SX160 IS (16MP) and SX240 HS (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX160 IS was manufactured 17 months after the SX240 HS which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the SX160 IS grades versus the SX240 HS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX160 IS vs Canon SX240 HS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX160 IS and Canon PowerShot SX240 HS. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX160 IS Gallery and Canon SX240 HS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX160 IS over the Canon SX240 HS
| SX160 IS | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2013 |  | February 2012 | More modern by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Canon SX240 HS over the Canon SX160 IS
| SX240 HS | SX160 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX160 IS and Canon SX240 HS
| SX160 IS | SX240 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX160 IS vs Canon SX240 HS Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX160 IS comes with outer measurements of 111mm x 73mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") having a weight of 291 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Canon SX240 HS has dimensions of 106mm x 61mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX160 IS and Canon SX240 HS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the SX160 IS against the SX240 HS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX160 IS and SX240 HS is 86 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX160 IS vs Canon SX240 HS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching specs. The image here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX160 IS and SX240 HS.
All in all, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Canon SX160 IS to result in more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger SX160 IS should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX160 IS vs Canon SX240 HS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX160 IS Portrait photography highlights
Canon SX240 HS Portrait photography highlights
you can focus manually
high flash sync (1/2,000s)
good megapixels (16MP)
supports face detect autofocus
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
you can focus manually
provides face detection autofocus
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Canon SX160 IS as a Street photography camera
Canon SX240 HS as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (291g)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (224g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Canon SX160 IS Sports photography factors
Canon SX240 HS Sports photography factors
amazing zoom range (28-448mm 16.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
supports tracking focus
great battery (380 shots)
low fps (1.0 frames per second)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking autofocus
max fps low (2.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (230 per charge)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon SX160 IS
Travel photography with Canon SX240 HS
great battery (380 CIPA)
lighter than competition in class (291g)
good megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
long zoom (448mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than competition in class (224g)
built-in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
great reach (500mm)
missing Timelapse function
not so great battery pack (230 per charge)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Canon SX160 IS Landscape photography advice
Canon SX240 HS Landscape photography advice
you can focus manually
quite wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
great battery (380 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
you can focus manually
fairly wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
not so great battery pack (230 per charge)
missing Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Canon SX160 IS Vlogging advice
Canon SX240 HS Vlogging advice
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
lighter than competition in class (291g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic socket
fairly wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (224 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
missing external microphone jack
Photography Glossary
Canon SX160 IS vs Canon SX240 HS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Canon |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Canon PowerShot SX240 HS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-06-21 | 2012-02-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4 | Digic 5 |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-448mm (16.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-6.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | PureColor II TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 15 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/3200 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 291 gr (0.64 pounds) | 224 gr (0.49 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 73 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") | 106 x 61 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 shots | 230 shots |
| Battery format | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | NB-6L |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $199 | $0 |