Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z400
86 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af213/af21359bdfa4f28ab8b439e5e28d6933f307906a" alt="Canon PowerShot SX160 IS front Canon PowerShot SX160 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70d0c/70d0c5e774e4b863f8559227301385a081b73620" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z400 front Casio Exilim EX-Z400 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-448mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 291g - 111 x 73 x 44mm
- Introduced June 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX150 IS
- Newer Model is Canon SX170 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z400 Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z400, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Canon and Casio. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the SX160 IS (16MP) and EX-Z400 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The SX160 IS was manufactured 4 years after the EX-Z400 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX160 IS being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the SX160 IS scores versus the EX-Z400 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z400 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX160 IS & Casio Exilim EX-Z400. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX160 IS Gallery & Casio EX-Z400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX160 IS over the Casio EX-Z400
SX160 IS | EX-Z400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 55 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Canon SX160 IS
EX-Z400 | SX160 IS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX160 IS and Casio EX-Z400
SX160 IS | EX-Z400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z400 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Canon SX160 IS offers outer measurements of 111mm x 73mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") along with a weight of 291 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-Z400 has specifications of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z400 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the SX160 IS against the EX-Z400.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/001d9/001d979923744a0c946f175d1ebe3819b82d980f" alt="Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z400 size comparison Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z400 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SX160 IS and EX-Z400 is 86 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93cda/93cda22789725cc1075cb07515d7ffc3a729a7da" alt="Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z400 top view buttons comparison Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z400 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z400 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at specs. The pic here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SX160 IS and EX-Z400.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Canon SX160 IS to resolve extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics far more aggressively. The newer SX160 IS will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94905/9490501a92aae403014bba71a2924852ca148a0b" alt="Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z400 sensor size comparison Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z400 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z400 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ee32/6ee326decec06dd3e5f4a2c4f38bc82b876a1a41" alt="Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon SX160 IS vs Casio EX-Z400 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Casio |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-06-21 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 4 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-448mm (16.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.6-7.0 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 291 grams (0.64 pounds) | 130 grams (0.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 73 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 pictures | - |
Type of battery | AA | - |
Battery model | 2 x AA | NP-40 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $199 | $0 |