Canon SX160 IS vs Kodak Z915
86 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Canon SX160 IS vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-448mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 291g - 111 x 73 x 44mm
- Introduced June 2013
- Superseded the Canon SX150 IS
- Renewed by Canon SX170 IS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Revealed January 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX160 IS vs Kodak Z915 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Canon SX160 IS and Kodak Z915, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Kodak. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the SX160 IS (16MP) and Z915 (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX160 IS was announced 4 years after the Z915 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the SX160 IS scores against the Z915 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Canon SX160 IS vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX160 IS and Kodak EasyShare Z915. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX160 IS Gallery and Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX160 IS over the Kodak Z915
| SX160 IS | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 55 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Canon SX160 IS
| Z915 | SX160 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX160 IS and Kodak Z915
| SX160 IS | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Canon SX160 IS vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Canon SX160 IS offers exterior dimensions of 111mm x 73mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") along with a weight of 291 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z915 has sizing of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Canon SX160 IS and Kodak Z915 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the SX160 IS against the Z915.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX160 IS and Z915 is 86 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX160 IS vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over specifications. The pic below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SX160 IS and Z915.
Plainly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You should expect to see the Canon SX160 IS to offer extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The younger SX160 IS provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX160 IS vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX160 IS vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Kodak |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-06-21 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-448mm (16.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 291 gr (0.64 lbs) | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 73 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | - |
| Battery form | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $199 | $200 |
