Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
Portability
86 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
86 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
Canon SX160 IS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-448mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 291g - 111 x 73 x 44mm
- Introduced June 2013
- Replaced the Canon SX150 IS
- Renewed by Canon SX170 IS
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SX160 IS (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX160 IS was manufactured 17 months later than the TG-820 iHS making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the SX160 IS matches up against the TG-820 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX160 IS & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX160 IS Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX160 IS over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| SX160 IS | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | February 2012 | Fresher by 17 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Canon SX160 IS
| TG-820 iHS | SX160 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX160 IS and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| SX160 IS | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SX160 IS offers external measurements of 111mm x 73mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 291 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the SX160 IS compared to the TG-820 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SX160 IS and TG-820 iHS is 86 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing merely by going over specs. The visual below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX160 IS and TG-820 iHS.
All in all, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Canon SX160 IS to offer you more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The fresher SX160 IS should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX160 IS as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
manual focus
high flash sync (1/2,000s)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
offers face detection focus
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
provides face detect focus
manual focus not available
no manual mode
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Canon SX160 IS Street photography advice
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography advice
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (291 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Canon SX160 IS Sports photography factors
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography factors
great zoom range (28-448mm 16.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (380 CIPA)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking focus
weather proof
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (220 CIPA)
lack of phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Canon SX160 IS Travel photography details
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography details
better than average battery power (380 per charge)
lighter than competition (291g)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
long reach (448mm)
missing Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
weather proof
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
not so great battery power (220 per charge)
low megapixels (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Canon SX160 IS Landscape photography highlights
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography highlights
manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
better than average battery power (380 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
pretty wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
manual focus not available
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
no manual mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
not so great battery power (220 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon SX160 IS
Vlogging with Olympus TG-820 iHS
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
lighter than competition (291 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external mic port
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone support
Photography Glossary
Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-06-21 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 4 | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-448mm (16.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 291 gr (0.64 pounds) | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 73 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | 220 photographs |
| Battery style | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $199 | $500 |