Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus TG-5
Portability
86 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
86 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
Portability
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
Canon SX160 IS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-448mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 291g - 111 x 73 x 44mm
- Introduced June 2013
- Old Model is Canon SX150 IS
- Replacement is Canon SX170 IS
Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Released May 2017
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-4
- New Model is Olympus TG-6
Photography Glossary Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Below is a extended review of the Canon SX160 IS versus Olympus TG-5, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the SX160 IS (16MP) and TG-5 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX160 IS was launched 4 years before the TG-5 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the SX160 IS scores vs the TG-5 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX160 IS & Olympus Tough TG-5. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX160 IS Gallery & Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX160 IS over the Olympus TG-5
| SX160 IS | TG-5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Canon SX160 IS
| TG-5 | SX160 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 |  | June 2013 | More recent by 47 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX160 IS and Olympus TG-5
| SX160 IS | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Canon SX160 IS comes with outside dimensions of 111mm x 73mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") with a weight of 291 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-5 has specifications of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX160 IS versus Olympus TG-5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the SX160 IS compared to the TG-5.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX160 IS and TG-5 is 86 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through specifications. The photograph below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX160 IS and TG-5.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Canon SX160 IS to provide more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images far more aggressively. The older SX160 IS will be behind in sensor tech.
Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon SX160 IS Portrait photography factors
Olympus TG-5 Portrait photography factors
you can focus manually
great flash sync speed (1/2,000s)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
supports face detect focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
focusing manually
supports face detection focus
saves RAW files
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
low MP (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Canon SX160 IS as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-5 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (291 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (250g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Canon SX160 IS Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-5 Sports photography highlights
excellent zoom range (28-448mm 16.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
supports tracking focus
great battery pack (380 shots)
low fps (1.0 fps)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
fast continuous shooting (20.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
better than average battery (340 shots)
lack of shutter priority mode
low MP (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Canon SX160 IS Travel photography highlights
Olympus TG-5 Travel photography highlights
great battery pack (380 CIPA)
lighter than competition in class (291 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
very long reach (448mm)
missing Timelapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
better than average battery (340 per charge)
environment sealing
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competition (250 grams)
low MP (12MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon SX160 IS
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-5
you can focus manually
really wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
great battery pack (380 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
focusing manually
pretty wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
better than average battery (340 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Canon SX160 IS Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-5 Vlogging factors
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focus
lighter than competition in class (291g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone socket
pretty wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
no external microphone port
more heavy than competition (250g)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Canon SX160 IS vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-06-21 | 2017-05-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4 | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-448mm (16.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 20.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 291 gr (0.64 pounds) | 250 gr (0.55 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 73 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | 340 pictures |
| Battery form | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $199 | $449 |
