Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung TL500
86 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af213/af21359bdfa4f28ab8b439e5e28d6933f307906a" alt="Canon PowerShot SX160 IS front Canon PowerShot SX160 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3208c/3208cbdbdd11e23eae5a341ac80491dad70aec44" alt="Samsung TL500 front Samsung TL500 front"
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-448mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 291g - 111 x 73 x 44mm
- Announced June 2013
- Earlier Model is Canon SX150 IS
- New Model is Canon SX170 IS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Launched July 2010
- Additionally referred to as EX1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung TL500 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Canon SX160 IS versus Samsung TL500, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the SX160 IS (16MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the SX160 IS (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") come with different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The SX160 IS was brought out 2 years after the TL500 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the SX160 IS scores against the TL500 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX160 IS and Samsung TL500. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX160 IS Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX160 IS over the Samsung TL500
SX160 IS | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2013 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 36 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Canon SX160 IS
TL500 | SX160 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Canon SX160 IS and Samsung TL500
SX160 IS | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon SX160 IS provides outside measurements of 111mm x 73mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") having a weight of 291 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Samsung TL500 has proportions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX160 IS versus Samsung TL500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the SX160 IS versus the TL500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50192/5019228ed6f42bca84795baf9a76b5a1519c5233" alt="Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung TL500 size comparison Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung TL500 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SX160 IS and TL500 is 86 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3dd3d/3dd3d7c301b24e6f9ab76773ccca1c8d8fadfd70" alt="Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by researching specifications. The picture underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SX160 IS and TL500.
To sum up, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SX160 IS due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Canon SX160 IS will provide you with extra detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern SX160 IS should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee0a9/ee0a97c1099fe5799c95eb4fbe01606ed7d2980a" alt="Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7a03/c7a03b7070a34590c7329de0e602bbe1587e478b" alt="Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Samsung |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Samsung TL500 |
Other name | - | EX1 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-06-21 | 2010-07-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 4 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-448mm (16.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 5.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 291 gr (0.64 pounds) | 386 gr (0.85 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 73 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | - |
Style of battery | AA | - |
Battery ID | 2 x AA | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $199 | $527 |