Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung WB800F
86 Imaging
39 Features
45 Overall
41
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-448mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 291g - 111 x 73 x 44mm
- Announced June 2013
- Previous Model is Canon SX150 IS
- Refreshed by Canon SX170 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Canon SX160 IS and Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and Samsung. The resolution of the SX160 IS (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX160 IS was announced 6 months after the WB800F and they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the SX160 IS matches up versus the WB800F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX160 IS & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX160 IS Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX160 IS over the Samsung WB800F
| SX160 IS | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Canon SX160 IS
| WB800F | SX160 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SX160 IS and Samsung WB800F
| SX160 IS | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 | January 2013 | Similar age | |
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX160 IS has physical dimensions of 111mm x 73mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") with a weight of 291 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Canon SX160 IS and Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the SX160 IS vs the WB800F.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX160 IS and WB800F is 86 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at a spec sheet. The picture below will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX160 IS and WB800F.
As you can see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels and you can expect similar quality of pictures but you should consider the launch date of the products into consideration.
Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon SX160 IS vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX160 IS | Samsung WB800F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-06-21 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-448mm (16.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 291g (0.64 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 73 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.9" x 1.7") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | - |
| Battery format | AA | - |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $199 | $300 |