Canon SX170 IS vs Olympus VR-330
88 Imaging
40 Features
41 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc9c1/bc9c176967008cf5fe64e0da02f79e15068c24b3" alt="Canon PowerShot SX170 IS front Canon PowerShot SX170 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Canon SX170 IS vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-448mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 251g - 108 x 71 x 44mm
- Introduced August 2013
- Succeeded the Canon SX160 IS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon SX170 IS vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Canon SX170 IS vs Olympus VR-330, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the SX170 IS (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SX170 IS was revealed 2 years after the VR-330 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the SX170 IS matches up against the VR-330 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX170 IS vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX170 IS and Olympus VR-330. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX170 IS Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX170 IS over the Olympus VR-330
SX170 IS | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2013 | ![]() | February 2011 | Newer by 31 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Canon SX170 IS
VR-330 | SX170 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX170 IS and Olympus VR-330
SX170 IS | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX170 IS vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon SX170 IS offers physical dimensions of 108mm x 71mm x 44mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX170 IS vs Olympus VR-330 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the SX170 IS compared to the VR-330.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e4ec/0e4ec8154f14eb95e698aa71a40a6122bb335ecc" alt="Canon SX170 IS vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison Canon SX170 IS vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SX170 IS and VR-330 is 88 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8830f/8830fbb429e9417ab587706f404a0f1d2d2d8eb3" alt="Canon SX170 IS vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison Canon SX170 IS vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX170 IS vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions only by going through specs. The picture below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX170 IS and VR-330.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Canon SX170 IS to produce greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher SX170 IS will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a46f7/a46f7d8e67b9e51947583dc693491bf8ec8c09b6" alt="Canon SX170 IS vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison Canon SX170 IS vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX170 IS vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fc2f/9fc2f2dce9470d16d345712603b2af06d3746a12" alt="Canon SX170 IS vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX170 IS vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon SX170 IS vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX170 IS | Olympus VR-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX170 IS | Olympus VR-330 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-08-22 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic 4 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-448mm (16.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 251 grams (0.55 lbs) | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 71 x 44mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-6LH | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $0 | $220 |