Canon SX20 IS vs Olympus VR-320
65 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
94 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Canon SX20 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 600g - 128 x 88 x 87mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Previous Model is Canon SX10 IS
- New Model is Canon SX30 IS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon SX20 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Canon SX20 IS vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the SX20 IS (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SX20 IS was brought out 12 months earlier than the VR-320 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX20 IS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the SX20 IS scores against the VR-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX20 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX20 IS & Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are provided at Canon SX20 IS Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX20 IS over the Olympus VR-320
| SX20 IS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Canon SX20 IS
| VR-320 | SX20 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 12 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Canon SX20 IS and Olympus VR-320
| SX20 IS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX20 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Canon SX20 IS comes with exterior measurements of 128mm x 88mm x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") and a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX20 IS vs Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the SX20 IS compared to the VR-320.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SX20 IS and VR-320 is 65 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX20 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SX20 IS and VR-320.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus VR-320 to resolve greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The older SX20 IS is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Canon SX20 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX20 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX20 IS | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX20 IS | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-560mm (20.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.80 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/500s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 600 grams (1.32 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 128 x 88 x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC / MMC / MMC Plus / HC MMC Plus | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $500 | $179 |