Canon SX20 IS vs Samsung SL202
65 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Canon SX20 IS vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 600g - 128 x 88 x 87mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Old Model is Canon SX10 IS
- Renewed by Canon SX30 IS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX20 IS vs Samsung SL202 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Canon SX20 IS vs Samsung SL202, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Samsung. The image resolution of the SX20 IS (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is fairly comparable and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX20 IS was revealed 17 months after the SL202 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX20 IS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the SX20 IS matches up vs the SL202 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX20 IS vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX20 IS & Samsung SL202. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX20 IS Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX20 IS over the Samsung SL202
| SX20 IS | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2010 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 17 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Canon SX20 IS
| SL202 | SX20 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Canon SX20 IS and Samsung SL202
| SX20 IS | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Canon SX20 IS vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon SX20 IS offers physical dimensions of 128mm x 88mm x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX20 IS vs Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the SX20 IS and the SL202.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SX20 IS and SL202 is 65 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX20 IS vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specs. The pic here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SX20 IS and SL202.
All in all, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Canon SX20 IS to show more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more modern SX20 IS provides an edge in sensor tech.
Canon SX20 IS vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon SX20 IS vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX20 IS | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX20 IS | Samsung SL202 |
| Also Known as | - | PL50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-560mm (20.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.80 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/500 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 600 grams (1.32 pounds) | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 128 x 88 x 87mm (5.0" x 3.5" x 3.4") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC / MMC / MMC Plus / HC MMC Plus | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $500 | $140 |