Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-FH100
90 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
92 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-FH100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Refreshed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 201g - 104 x 60 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
Photography Glossary Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-FH100 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-FH100, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Casio. The sensor resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the EX-FH100 (10MP) is fairly similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX200 IS was announced 13 months prior to the EX-FH100 making them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the SX200 IS scores versus the EX-FH100 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-FH100 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Casio Exilim EX-FH100. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Casio EX-FH100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Casio EX-FH100
| SX200 IS | EX-FH100 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH100 over the Canon SX200 IS
| EX-FH100 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2010 |  | May 2009 | Newer by 13 months |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Casio EX-FH100
| SX200 IS | EX-FH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-FH100 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS offers external dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-FH100 has proportions of 104mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 201 grams (0.44 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-FH100 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the SX200 IS compared to the EX-FH100.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SX200 IS and EX-FH100 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-FH100 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The image here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX200 IS and EX-FH100.
As you can see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Canon SX200 IS to offer more detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-FH100 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-FH100 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Casio Exilim EX-FH100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.2-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps), 448 x 336 (240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 201g (0.44 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 104 x 60 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-5L | NP-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $329 | $299 |
