Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-FH25
90 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-FH25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Announced May 2009
- New Model is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-FH25 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Canon SX200 IS versus Casio EX-FH25, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Casio. The resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the EX-FH25 (10MP) is very well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX200 IS was introduced 13 months before the EX-FH25 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick summary of how the SX200 IS scores against the EX-FH25 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-FH25 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Casio Exilim EX-FH25. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Casio EX-FH25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Casio EX-FH25
| SX200 IS | EX-FH25 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Canon SX200 IS
| EX-FH25 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2010 |  | May 2009 | Fresher by 13 months |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Casio EX-FH25
| SX200 IS | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-FH25 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon SX200 IS features physical dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Casio EX-FH25 has measurements of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") with a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX200 IS versus Casio EX-FH25 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the SX200 IS against the EX-FH25.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX200 IS and EX-FH25 is 90 and 69 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-FH25 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing only by looking at specs. The graphic underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX200 IS and EX-FH25.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Canon SX200 IS to give more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos much more aggressively. The older SX200 IS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-FH25 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-FH25 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 40.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 524g (1.16 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-5L | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $329 | $450 |