Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H10
90 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Launched May 2009
- Later Model is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Released June 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H10 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H10, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Casio. The image resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the EX-H10 (12MP) is pretty close and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SX200 IS was announced around the same time to the EX-H10 so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the SX200 IS matches up vs the EX-H10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Casio Exilim EX-H10. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Casio EX-H10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Casio EX-H10
| SX200 IS | EX-H10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Canon SX200 IS
| EX-H10 | SX200 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Casio EX-H10
| SX200 IS | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2009 |  | June 2009 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H10 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SX200 IS comes with external measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-H10 has measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the SX200 IS and the EX-H10.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and EX-H10 is 90 and 93 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SX200 IS and EX-H10.
As you have seen, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution so you should expect comparable quality of photos but you would want to consider the release date of the cameras into account.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H10 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H10 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Casio Exilim EX-H10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2009-06-11 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.2-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-5L | NP-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $329 | $300 |