Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H15
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Replacement is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H15 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H15, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Casio. The sensor resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the EX-H15 (14MP) is fairly close and they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SX200 IS was brought out 7 months earlier than the EX-H15 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the SX200 IS grades vs the EX-H15 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H15 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Casio Exilim EX-H15. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Casio EX-H15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Casio EX-H15
| SX200 IS | EX-H15 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Canon SX200 IS
| EX-H15 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 |  | May 2009 | Newer by 7 months |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Casio EX-H15
| SX200 IS | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H15 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon SX200 IS has physical measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-H15 has measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H15 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the SX200 IS against the EX-H15.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and EX-H15 is 90 and 93 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H15 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through technical specs. The pic here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SX200 IS and EX-H15.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-H15 to provide you with more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H15 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H15 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Casio Exilim EX-H15 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.2-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) | 161 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-5L | NP-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $329 | $300 |