Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H20G
90 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
91 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H20G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Launched May 2009
- Replacement is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Revealed September 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H20G Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Canon SX200 IS versus Casio EX-H20G, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Casio. The image resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the EX-H20G (14MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX200 IS was launched 16 months earlier than the EX-H20G which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the SX200 IS grades against the EX-H20G in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H20G Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Casio Exilim EX-H20G. The complete galleries are provided at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Casio EX-H20G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Casio EX-H20G
| SX200 IS | EX-H20G |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Canon SX200 IS
| EX-H20G | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2010 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 16 months |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Casio EX-H20G
| SX200 IS | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H20G Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Canon SX200 IS provides external measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Casio EX-H20G has sizing of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX200 IS versus Casio EX-H20G in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the SX200 IS vs the EX-H20G.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and EX-H20G is 90 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H20G Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements simply by checking specs. The graphic below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX200 IS and EX-H20G.
All in all, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Casio EX-H20G to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The older SX200 IS is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H20G Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-H20G Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Casio Exilim EX-H20G |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2010-09-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.2-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 461k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 216 gr (0.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-5L | NP-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $329 | $300 |