Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z35
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Announced May 2009
- Updated by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Canon SX200 IS and Casio EX-Z35, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Casio. The sensor resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the EX-Z35 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX200 IS was introduced 9 months before the EX-Z35 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the SX200 IS matches up vs the EX-Z35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Casio EX-Z35
| SX200 IS | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Canon SX200 IS
| EX-Z35 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2010 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 9 months |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Casio EX-Z35
| SX200 IS | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS enjoys exterior dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z35 has proportions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SX200 IS and Casio EX-Z35 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the SX200 IS versus the EX-Z35.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX200 IS and EX-Z35 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out a spec sheet. The picture here will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX200 IS and EX-Z35.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same MP so you can expect comparable quality of files but you will want to take the age of the cameras into account. The more aged SX200 IS will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2010-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 124 gr (0.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-5L | NP-82 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $329 | $99 |