Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z90
90 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
96 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Renewed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Announced August 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z90 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z90, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Casio. The image resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the EX-Z90 (12MP) is very close and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SX200 IS was announced 3 months earlier than the EX-Z90 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the SX200 IS scores versus the EX-Z90 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z90 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Casio Exilim EX-Z90. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Casio EX-Z90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Casio EX-Z90
| SX200 IS | EX-Z90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Canon SX200 IS
| EX-Z90 | SX200 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Casio EX-Z90
| SX200 IS | EX-Z90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2009 |  | August 2009 | Same generation |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z90 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon SX200 IS has got physical measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z90 has measurements of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z90 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the SX200 IS vs the EX-Z90.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and EX-Z90 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z90 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The graphic below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX200 IS and EX-Z90.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of images but you should always take the release date of the cameras into account.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z90 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-Z90 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2009-08-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Digic 4 |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lb) | 121 grams (0.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-5L | NP-60 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $329 | $150 |