Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR100
90 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Renewed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR100 Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR100, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Canon and Casio. The sensor resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the EX-ZR100 (12MP) is relatively close and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX200 IS was unveiled 3 years prior to the EX-ZR100 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the SX200 IS scores versus the EX-ZR100 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Casio Exilim EX-ZR100. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Casio EX-ZR100
| SX200 IS | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Canon SX200 IS
| EX-ZR100 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 26 months |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Casio EX-ZR100
| SX200 IS | EX-ZR100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR100 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Canon SX200 IS enjoys physical dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Casio EX-ZR100 has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR100 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the SX200 IS vs the EX-ZR100.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and EX-ZR100 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR100 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX200 IS and EX-ZR100.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same resolution so you should expect comparable quality of images although you should really consider the production date of the cameras into account. The older SX200 IS will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR100 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR100 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 40.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 204g (0.45 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-5L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $329 | $300 |