Clicky

Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR400

Portability
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front
 
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43

Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Key Specs

Canon SX200 IS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
  • 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
  • Announced May 2009
  • Replacement is Canon SX210 IS
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Launched January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Overview

On this page, we are comparing the Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR400, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Canon and Casio. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and EX-ZR400 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The SX200 IS was brought out 4 years before the EX-ZR400 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the SX200 IS matches up against the EX-ZR400 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Casio EX-ZR400

          

          

            
 SX200 IS EX-ZR400 
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Canon SX200 IS

          

          

            
 EX-ZR400 SX200 IS 
LaunchedJanuary 2013May 2009More recent by 45 months
Display resolution461k230kCrisper display (+231k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Casio EX-ZR400

          

          

            
 SX200 IS EX-ZR400 
Manually focus  Dial accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen  Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Neither comes with Touch friendly display
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS comes with outside dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR400 has proportions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR400 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the SX200 IS against the EX-ZR400.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR400 size comparison
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and EX-ZR400 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR400 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Sometimes, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through a spec sheet. The visual below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX200 IS and EX-ZR400.
As you can see, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR400 to provide you with greater detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The older SX200 IS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

            Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR400 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
 Canon SX200 IS as a Portrait photography camera
 Casio EX-ZR400 as a Portrait photography camera
28
 you can focus manually
 cannot use external flash
 megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW files
39
 you can focus manually
 decent MP (16MP)
 can't use external flash
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Street Comparison
Street photography with Canon SX200 IS
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR400
60
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 lighter than others in class (247g)
 fixed screen
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW files
62
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than others in class (205 grams)
 fixed screen
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
Photography Glossary
Sports Comparison
 Canon SX200 IS as a Sports photography camera
 Casio EX-ZR400 as a Sports photography camera
27
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 very slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
 megapixel count low (12MP)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no phase detect auto focus
57
 long zoom range (24-300mm  12.5 x zoom)
 fast continuous shooting (30.0 frames per second)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent MP (16 megapixels)
 comes with tracking autofocus
 better than average battery life (500 shots)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Travel Comparison
 Canon SX200 IS as a Travel photography camera
 Casio EX-ZR400 as a Travel photography camera
62
 lighter than others in class (247g)
 has built in flash
 relatively wide (28mm)
 long zoom (336mm)
 does not have Timelapse recording
 megapixel count low (12MP)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
71
 better than average battery life (500 CIPA)
 lighter than others in class (205 grams)
 decent MP (16 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 really wide (24mm)
 great reach (300mm)
 missing Timelapse function
 does not have selfie friendly screen
 slow max aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Landscape Comparison
Canon SX200 IS Landscape photography details
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography details
42
 you can focus manually
 relatively wide (28mm)
 screen is a good size (3")
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
 megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW files
 does not have Timelapse recording
52
 you can focus manually
 really wide (24mm)
 screen size is decent (3")
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent MP (16MP)
 better than average battery life (500 per charge)
 can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.0)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
 missing Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX200 IS Vlogging information
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging information
29
 relatively wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 lighter than others in class (247g)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
 does not have external microphone support
33
 really wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 lighter than others in class (205 grams)
 slow max aperture (f3.0)
 does not have selfie friendly screen
 missing external microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
        
                
        

          

            
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR400 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX200 IS and Casio EX-ZR400
 Canon PowerShot SX200 ISCasio Exilim EX-ZR400
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Casio
Model type Canon PowerShot SX200 IS Casio Exilim EX-ZR400
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-05-14 2013-01-29
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - Exilim Engine HS
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW photos    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
AF single    
AF tracking    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detection AF    
Contract detection AF    
Phase detection AF    
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-336mm (12.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Highest aperture f/3.4-5.3 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range 0cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 461 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Screen tech - Super Clear TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 seconds 15 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames per sec 30.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash distance 3.20 m 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 247 grams (0.54 lb) 205 grams (0.45 lb)
Physical dimensions 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 500 images
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NB-5L NP-130
Self timer Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple)
Time lapse recording    
Storage media SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $329 $0