Clicky

Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR800

Portability
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front
 
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45

Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Key Specs

Canon SX200 IS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
  • 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
  • Announced May 2009
  • Refreshed by Canon SX210 IS
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Released August 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Canon SX200 IS and Casio EX-ZR800, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Canon and Casio. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and EX-ZR800 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The SX200 IS was announced 5 years prior to the EX-ZR800 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the SX200 IS grades against the EX-ZR800 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Casio EX-ZR800

          

          

            
 SX200 IS EX-ZR800 
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Canon SX200 IS

          

          

            
 EX-ZR800 SX200 IS 
ReleasedAugust 2013May 2009Newer by 51 months
Display resolution922k230kCrisper display (+692k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Casio EX-ZR800

          

          

            
 SX200 IS EX-ZR800 
Manual focus  More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurement
Selfie screen  Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Neither contains Touch friendly display
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon SX200 IS has got outside measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Casio EX-ZR800 has measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Canon SX200 IS and Casio EX-ZR800 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the SX200 IS compared to the EX-ZR800.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR800 size comparison
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and EX-ZR800 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR800 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Oftentimes, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specs. The pic underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX200 IS and EX-ZR800.
All in all, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR800 to produce extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

            Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR800 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
 Canon SX200 IS as a Portrait photography camera
 Casio EX-ZR800 as a Portrait photography camera
28
 manual focus
 cannot use external flash
 resolution not great (12 megapixels)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
43
 focusing manually
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 has face detect focus
 cannot use external flash
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
Photography Glossary
Street Comparison
Canon SX200 IS Street photography highlights
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography highlights
60
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 lighter than competition in class (247 grams)
 fixed screen
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
61
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
 screen does not articulate
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sports Comparison
Canon SX200 IS Sports photography features
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography features
27
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 max frames per second low (1.0 frames per second)
 resolution not great (12 megapixels)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect auto focus
50
 excellent zoom range (25-450mm  18.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 has tracking focus
 good battery power (470 CIPA)
 very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Travel Comparison
Canon SX200 IS Travel photography details
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography details
62
 lighter than competition in class (247g)
 has built in flash
 quite wide (28mm)
 long reach (336mm)
 lack of Time Lapse recording
 resolution not great (12MP)
 display is not selfie friendly
 sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
74
 good battery power (470 CIPA)
 lighter than competition in class (222g)
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 really wide (25mm)
 long reach (450mm)
 doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Landscape Comparison
Canon SX200 IS Landscape photography details
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography details
42
 manual focus
 quite wide (28mm)
 screen size is good (3")
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
 resolution not great (12 megapixels)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
 lack of Time Lapse recording
54
 focusing manually
 really wide (25mm)
 decent sized screen (3")
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 good battery power (470 CIPA)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX200 IS Vlogging features
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging features
29
 quite wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Optical)
 lighter than competition in class (247g)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
 display is not selfie friendly
 video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
 lack of mic support
34
 really wide (25mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 has face detect focus
 good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
 no mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
        
                
        

          

            
Canon SX200 IS vs Casio EX-ZR800 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX200 IS and Casio EX-ZR800
 Canon PowerShot SX200 ISCasio Exilim EX-ZR800
General Information
Company Canon Casio
Model type Canon PowerShot SX200 IS Casio Exilim EX-ZR800
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-05-14 2013-08-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - EXILIM Engine HS 3
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW images    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Touch to focus    
Continuous autofocus    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Autofocus center weighted    
Autofocus multi area    
Autofocus live view    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-336mm (12.0x) 25-450mm (18.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.4-5.3 f/3.5-5.9
Macro focusing range 0cm 4cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Screen technology - Super Clear TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash distance 3.20 m 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
External flash    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps),
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 247 grams (0.54 pounds) 222 grams (0.49 pounds)
Dimensions 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 470 photos
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID NB-5L NP-130
Self timer Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom)
Time lapse recording    
Storage type SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $329 $429