Canon SX200 IS vs FujiFilm S2500HD
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7726/a77266e16c8e817031df1e9ec6e12ac4a12ca9c5" alt="Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9af60/9af6067a5d322f74a461f6a15db949b007f9171c" alt="FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD front FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD front"
78 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Canon SX200 IS vs FujiFilm S2500HD Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Announced May 2009
- Renewed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 337g - 110 x 73 x 81mm
- Announced July 2010
- Alternate Name is FinePix S2600HD
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon SX200 IS vs FujiFilm S2500HD Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Canon SX200 IS and FujiFilm S2500HD, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the S2500HD (12MP) is fairly close and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The SX200 IS was manufactured 13 months earlier than the S2500HD making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S2500HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the SX200 IS grades versus the S2500HD with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon SX200 IS vs FujiFilm S2500HD Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and FujiFilm S2500HD Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the FujiFilm S2500HD
SX200 IS | S2500HD | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2500HD over the Canon SX200 IS
S2500HD | SX200 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2010 | ![]() | May 2009 | Newer by 13 months |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and FujiFilm S2500HD
SX200 IS | S2500HD | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Canon SX200 IS vs FujiFilm S2500HD Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS features external measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the FujiFilm S2500HD has proportions of 110mm x 73mm x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") with a weight of 337 grams (0.74 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX200 IS and FujiFilm S2500HD in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the SX200 IS versus the S2500HD.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a43e/3a43e072abe85569ba0e12749ef05f0b4e4239bb" alt="Canon SX200 IS vs FujiFilm S2500HD size comparison Canon SX200 IS vs FujiFilm S2500HD size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and S2500HD is 90 and 78 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e9d5/5e9d5116b59aeaa966882f3de48c8434fc9833c4" alt="Canon SX200 IS vs FujiFilm S2500HD top view buttons comparison Canon SX200 IS vs FujiFilm S2500HD top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX200 IS vs FujiFilm S2500HD Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specifications. The pic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX200 IS and S2500HD.
Plainly, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of photographs however you will want to take the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged SX200 IS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34071/34071f411b0936f19e1975fd2fc4f143af192ebf" alt="Canon SX200 IS vs FujiFilm S2500HD sensor size comparison Canon SX200 IS vs FujiFilm S2500HD sensor size comparison"
Canon SX200 IS vs FujiFilm S2500HD Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75460/75460a03e689d1ecc91d62497c5daa26d0c63c73" alt="Canon SX200 IS vs FujiFilm S2500HD Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX200 IS vs FujiFilm S2500HD Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon SX200 IS vs FujiFilm S2500HD Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD |
Also Known as | - | FinePix S2600HD |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2010-07-06 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 99 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 4.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 337 grams (0.74 lbs) |
Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 110 x 73 x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NB-5L | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $329 | $200 |