Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm F800EXR
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35


90 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Successor is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Launched July 2012
- Previous Model is Fujifilm F770EXR
- Newer Model is Fujifilm F900EXR

Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Canon SX200 IS versus Fujifilm F800EXR, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and the SX200 IS (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") feature totally different sensor sizing.

The SX200 IS was introduced 4 years prior to the Fujifilm F800EXR which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the SX200 IS grades against the Fujifilm F800EXR for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Fujifilm F800EXR
SX200 IS | Fujifilm F800EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Canon SX200 IS
Fujifilm F800EXR | SX200 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2012 | ![]() | May 2009 | Newer by 38 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Fujifilm F800EXR
SX200 IS | Fujifilm F800EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon SX200 IS offers outside dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Fujifilm F800EXR has measurements of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX200 IS versus Fujifilm F800EXR in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the SX200 IS and the Fujifilm F800EXR.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and Fujifilm F800EXR is 90 and 90 respectively.

Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions just by seeing specs. The image below will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX200 IS and Fujifilm F800EXR.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The SX200 IS using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Fujifilm F800EXR will produce greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS will be behind in sensor innovation.

Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm F800EXR Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2012-07-25 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | EXR |
Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focus range | 0cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 41 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.9 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 143 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-5L | NP-50A |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $329 | $330 |