Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Launched May 2009
- Successor is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Announced July 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Canon SX200 IS and Fujifilm Real 3D W1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) is very similar and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX200 IS was brought out 2 months earlier than the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the SX200 IS scores against the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| SX200 IS | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Canon SX200 IS
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | SX200 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| SX200 IS | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2009 |  | July 2009 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS has got outer measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 has proportions of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") and a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX200 IS and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the SX200 IS vs the Fujifilm Real 3D W1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes only by going over a spec sheet. The pic here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX200 IS and Fujifilm Real 3D W1.
As you can see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Canon SX200 IS to deliver extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | RP (Real Photo) 3D |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.7-4.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.8 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) | 260 grams (0.57 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-5L | NP-95 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $329 | $900 |