Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
![Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Canon-PowerShot-SX200-IS.jpg)
![Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-S9400W/Fujifilm-S9400W-front.jpg)
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Updated by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced January 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Canon SX200 IS versus Fujifilm S9400W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Canon and FujiFilm. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The SX200 IS was introduced 5 years before the Fujifilm S9400W which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a brief summary of how the SX200 IS scores vs the Fujifilm S9400W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Fujifilm FinePix S9400W. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Fujifilm S9400W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Fujifilm S9400W
SX200 IS | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Canon SX200 IS
Fujifilm S9400W | SX200 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | May 2009 | Newer by 56 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Fujifilm S9400W
SX200 IS | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SX200 IS offers external dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Fujifilm S9400W has measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
See the Canon SX200 IS versus Fujifilm S9400W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the SX200 IS against the Fujifilm S9400W.
![Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W size comparison Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX200-IS-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-S9400W-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SX200 IS and Fujifilm S9400W is 90 and 61 respectively.
![Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W top view buttons comparison Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX200-IS-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-S9400W-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions only by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX200 IS and Fujifilm S9400W.
As you can see, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Fujifilm S9400W to resolve extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
![Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W sensor size comparison Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX200-IS-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-S9400W-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX200-IS-vs-Fujifilm-FinePix-S9400W-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Canon SX200 IS vs Fujifilm S9400W Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 97 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1700 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 7.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 670g (1.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 images |
Battery type | - | AA |
Battery ID | NB-5L | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $329 | $330 |