Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak C135
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak C135 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Replacement is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Photography Glossary Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak C135 Overview
Following is a in-depth review of the Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak C135, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Kodak. The image resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the C135 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX200 IS was launched 3 years prior to the C135 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the SX200 IS matches up vs the C135 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak C135 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Kodak EasyShare C135. The complete galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Kodak C135 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Kodak C135
| SX200 IS | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 112k | Crisper display (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Canon SX200 IS
| C135 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 32 months |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak C135
| SX200 IS | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon SX200 IS enjoys outside measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Kodak C135 has measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak C135 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the SX200 IS and the C135.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and C135 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes just by checking a spec sheet. The picture below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SX200 IS and C135.
As you can see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Kodak C135 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak C135 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Kodak EasyShare C135 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Kodak |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Kodak EasyShare C135 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1250 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.4 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 112k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 175g (0.39 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-5L | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $329 | $0 |