Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak C140
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak C140 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Updated by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak C140 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Canon SX200 IS versus Kodak C140, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Kodak. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and C140 (8MP) and the SX200 IS (1/2.3") and C140 (1/2.5") possess different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SX200 IS was launched 5 months after the C140 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the SX200 IS scores vs the C140 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak C140 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Kodak EasyShare C140. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Kodak C140 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Kodak C140
| SX200 IS | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Canon SX200 IS
| C140 | SX200 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak C140
| SX200 IS | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2009 |  | January 2009 | Same generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak C140 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon SX200 IS comes with outer dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Kodak C140 has measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Canon SX200 IS versus Kodak C140 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the SX200 IS compared to the C140.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the SX200 IS and C140 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak C140 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out a spec sheet. The image below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SX200 IS and C140.
Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The SX200 IS featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Canon SX200 IS will provide more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak C140 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak C140 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Kodak EasyShare C140 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Kodak |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Kodak EasyShare C140 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 8MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/2.7-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 13cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 160g (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-5L | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $329 | $80 |