Clicky

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M530

Portability
90
Imaging
35
Features
37
Overall
35
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front
 
Kodak EasyShare M530 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M530 Key Specs

Canon SX200 IS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
  • 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
  • Revealed May 2009
  • New Model is Canon SX210 IS
Kodak M530
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-108mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 94 x 57 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M530 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Canon SX200 IS versus Kodak M530, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Kodak. The resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the M530 (12MP) is very close and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The SX200 IS was released 7 months earlier than the M530 so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief view of how the SX200 IS grades vs the M530 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Kodak M530

 SX200 IS M530 
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Kodak M530 over the Canon SX200 IS

 M530 SX200 IS 
RevealedJanuary 2010May 2009More recent by 7 months

Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak M530

 SX200 IS M530 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M530 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX200 IS has physical dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Kodak M530 has dimensions of 94mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).

Analyze the Canon SX200 IS versus Kodak M530 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the SX200 IS and the M530.

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M530 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and M530 is 90 and 95 respectively.

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M530 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M530 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing specs. The photograph here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX200 IS and M530.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photos though you have to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The older SX200 IS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M530 sensor size comparison

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M530 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M530 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon SX200 IS
Portrait photography with Kodak M530
29
manual focus
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
21
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Street photography highlights
Kodak M530 Street photography highlights
60
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (247g)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
47
fixed screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
maximum ISO low (1,000)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Canon SX200 IS as a Sports photography camera
Kodak M530 as a Sports photography camera
27
image stabilization (Optical)
low fps (1.0 fps)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
17
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Travel photography advice
Kodak M530 Travel photography advice
63
lighter than competition in class (247 grams)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
long zoom (336mm)
missing Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
58
built-in flash
fast max aperture (f)
missing Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (36mm)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Landscape photography info
Kodak M530 Landscape photography info
43
manual focus
really wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
27
fast max aperture (f)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (1,000)
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Vlogging factors
Kodak M530 Vlogging factors
30
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (247g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.4)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone jack
25
fast max aperture (f)
wide angle not great (36mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
missing mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak M530 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX200 IS and Kodak M530
 Canon PowerShot SX200 ISKodak EasyShare M530
General Information
Brand Canon Kodak
Model Canon PowerShot SX200 IS Kodak EasyShare M530
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2009-05-14 2010-01-05
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 1000
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-336mm (12.0x) 36-108mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.4-5.3 -
Macro focus distance 0cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15 secs 1/8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/1400 secs
Continuous shutter rate 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.20 m 4.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 247 grams (0.54 lbs) 150 grams (0.33 lbs)
Physical dimensions 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") 94 x 57 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NB-5L KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $329 $110