Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z950
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
89 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Announced May 2009
- Refreshed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Revealed June 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z950 Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Canon SX200 IS versus Kodak Z950, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Kodak. The resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is very similar and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SX200 IS was announced 13 months prior to the Z950 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the SX200 IS matches up against the Z950 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Kodak EasyShare Z950. The whole galleries are available at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Kodak Z950
| SX200 IS | Z950 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Canon SX200 IS
| Z950 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2010 | May 2009 | More modern by 13 months |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Z950
| SX200 IS | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS enjoys outer dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Kodak Z950 has proportions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Canon SX200 IS versus Kodak Z950 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the SX200 IS vs the Z950.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SX200 IS and Z950 is 90 and 89 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over specifications. The pic here will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX200 IS and Z950.
To sum up, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact MP therefore you should expect similar quality of photographs but you will want to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The more aged SX200 IS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Kodak |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 0cm | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) | 243 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-5L | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $329 | $250 |