Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z980
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z980 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Refreshed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Launched January 2009
Photography Glossary Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z980 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Z980, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Canon and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the Z980 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SX200 IS was introduced 5 months later than the Z980 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the SX200 IS grades against the Z980 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z980 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Kodak EasyShare Z980. The whole galleries are provided at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Kodak Z980 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Kodak Z980
| SX200 IS | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k | 201k | Crisper screen (+29k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Canon SX200 IS
| Z980 | SX200 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Z980
| SX200 IS | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2009 | January 2009 | Same generation | |
| Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z980 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon SX200 IS provides external dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z980 has sizing of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") along with a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Z980 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the SX200 IS compared to the Z980.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and Z980 is 90 and 68 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z980 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX200 IS and Z980.
Clearly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of files but you really should take the production date of the cameras into account.
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z980 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z980 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Kodak |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Kodak EasyShare Z980 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2009-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focus range | 0cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 201k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 6.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 445g (0.98 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NB-5L | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $329 | $249 |