Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981
90 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7726/a77266e16c8e817031df1e9ec6e12ac4a12ca9c5" alt="Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c378d/c378dd1d27b87b0a840c3383b7475dd39cae096c" alt="Kodak EasyShare Z981 front Kodak EasyShare Z981 front"
66 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Released May 2009
- Renewed by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Introduced July 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Z981, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Canon and Kodak. The image resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the Z981 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The SX200 IS was brought out 13 months earlier than the Z981 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Kodak Z981 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the SX200 IS grades vs the Z981 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Kodak EasyShare Z981. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Kodak Z981 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Kodak Z981
SX200 IS | Z981 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 201k | Sharper screen (+29k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Canon SX200 IS
Z981 | SX200 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2010 | ![]() | May 2009 | Newer by 13 months |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Z981
SX200 IS | Z981 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS offers outside dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Kodak Z981 has proportions of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") having a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Z981 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the SX200 IS versus the Z981.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f938/8f938eba4d2a95e3009be9c16ebe1de5579ba192" alt="Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 size comparison Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and Z981 is 90 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/190b4/190b45cd2ba4ecd50daecec1b4a72cdb7fbffbb9" alt="Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 top view buttons comparison Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The pic here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX200 IS and Z981.
To sum up, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Kodak Z981 to produce extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1dcf1/1dcf18be26bc1b777829ff0aa34486ee28ec3825" alt="Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 sensor size comparison Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d496f/d496f9f748916a90fb7ca194518838e1d42ef3be" alt="Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Kodak |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Kodak EasyShare Z981 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-05-14 | 2010-07-06 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 201 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 6.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 540g (1.19 pounds) |
Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NB-5L | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $329 | $299 |