Clicky

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981

Portability
90
Imaging
35
Features
37
Overall
35
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front
 
Kodak EasyShare Z981 front
Portability
66
Imaging
37
Features
37
Overall
37

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 Key Specs

Canon SX200 IS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
  • 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Renewed by Canon SX210 IS
Kodak Z981
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
  • Introduced July 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 Overview

Lets look a bit more in depth at the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Z981, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Canon and Kodak. The image resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the Z981 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The SX200 IS was brought out 13 months earlier than the Z981 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Kodak Z981 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the SX200 IS grades vs the Z981 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Kodak Z981

 SX200 IS Z981 
Screen resolution230k201kSharper screen (+29k dot)

Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Canon SX200 IS

 Z981 SX200 IS 
IntroducedJuly 2010May 2009Newer by 13 months

Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Z981

 SX200 IS Z981 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS offers outside dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Kodak Z981 has proportions of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") having a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs).

Check out the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Z981 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the SX200 IS versus the Z981.

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and Z981 is 90 and 66 respectively.

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The pic here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX200 IS and Z981.

To sum up, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Kodak Z981 to produce extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged SX200 IS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 sensor size comparison

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Portrait photography factors
Kodak Z981 Portrait photography factors
29
manual focus
external flash not possible
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
46
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
supports RAW formats
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Street photography info
Kodak Z981 Street photography info
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (247g)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
50
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
heavier than average (540 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Sports photography highlights
Kodak Z981 Sports photography highlights
27
has image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
43
excellent zoom range (26-676mm 26.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
max fps low (1.0 frames per second)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Travel photography factors
Kodak Z981 Travel photography factors
63
lighter than competition (247g)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
long zoom (336mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
resolution not great (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
53
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (26mm)
great reach (676mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than average (540 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Landscape photography factors
Kodak Z981 Landscape photography factors
43
manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
51
manual focus
rather wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
supports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon SX200 IS
Vlogging with Kodak Z981
30
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (247 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic support
22
rather wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic socket
heavier than average (540g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z981 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Z981
 Canon PowerShot SX200 ISKodak EasyShare Z981
General Information
Company Canon Kodak
Model type Canon PowerShot SX200 IS Kodak EasyShare Z981
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-05-14 2010-07-06
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-336mm (12.0x) 26-676mm (26.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.4-5.3 f/2.8-5.0
Macro focusing distance 0cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 201 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Features
Min shutter speed 15 seconds 16 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/3200 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.20 m 6.20 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 247g (0.54 pounds) 540g (1.19 pounds)
Dimensions 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NB-5L 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $329 $299