Clicky

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990

Portability
90
Imaging
35
Features
37
Overall
35
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS front
 
Kodak EasyShare Z990 front
Portability
68
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990 Key Specs

Canon SX200 IS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
  • 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Updated by Canon SX210 IS
Kodak Z990
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
  • Released January 2011
  • Additionally Known as EasyShare Max
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990 Overview

Below is a in-depth analysis of the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Z990, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and Kodak. The resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the Z990 (12MP) is relatively similar and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The SX200 IS was revealed 20 months prior to the Z990 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Kodak Z990 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a quick summary of how the SX200 IS scores against the Z990 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Kodak Z990

 SX200 IS Z990 

Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Canon SX200 IS

 Z990 SX200 IS 
ReleasedJanuary 2011May 2009More recent by 20 months
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Z990

 SX200 IS Z990 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990 Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS has exterior measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z990 has proportions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") and a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Z990 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the SX200 IS versus the Z990.

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and Z990 is 90 and 68 respectively.

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990 top view buttons comparison

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements purely by going over specs. The visual here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX200 IS and Z990.

All in all, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs although you may want to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The older SX200 IS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990 sensor size comparison

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon SX200 IS
Portrait photography with Kodak Z990
29
has manual focus
cannot use external flash
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
41
focusing manually
provides face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
no external flash support
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Street photography information
Kodak Z990 Street photography information
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (247 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
54
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Sports photography advice
Kodak Z990 Sports photography advice
27
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow fps (1.0 frames/s)
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
34
long zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
low frames per second (6.0 fps)
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Travel photography highlights
Kodak Z990 Travel photography highlights
63
lighter than competitors in class (247 grams)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
long reach (336mm)
missing Timelapse recording
low resolution (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
51
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
long zoom (840mm)
no Timelapse function
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Canon SX200 IS Landscape photography details
Kodak Z990 Landscape photography details
43
has manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
45
focusing manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SX200 IS as a Vlogging camera
Kodak Z990 as a Vlogging camera
30
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (247 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone jack
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Z990
 Canon PowerShot SX200 ISKodak EasyShare Z990
General Information
Brand Canon Kodak
Model Canon PowerShot SX200 IS Kodak EasyShare Z990
Also called - EasyShare Max
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-05-14 2011-01-04
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 125
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-336mm (12.0x) 28-840mm (30.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.4-5.3 f/2.8-5.6
Macro focus distance 0cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 secs 16 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/3200 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames/s 6.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.20 m 8.90 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 247g (0.54 lbs) 445g (0.98 lbs)
Dimensions 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NB-5L 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $329 $299