Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990
90 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Released May 2009
- Updated by Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Released January 2011
- Additionally Known as EasyShare Max
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Z990, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Canon and Kodak. The resolution of the SX200 IS (12MP) and the Z990 (12MP) is relatively similar and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX200 IS was revealed 20 months prior to the Z990 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon SX200 IS being a Compact camera and the Kodak Z990 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a quick summary of how the SX200 IS scores against the Z990 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS & Kodak EasyShare Z990. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX200 IS Gallery & Kodak Z990 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Kodak Z990
SX200 IS | Z990 |
---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Canon SX200 IS
Z990 | SX200 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | May 2009 | More recent by 20 months | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Z990
SX200 IS | Z990 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon SX200 IS has exterior measurements of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z990 has proportions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") and a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX200 IS and Kodak Z990 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the SX200 IS versus the Z990.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SX200 IS and Z990 is 90 and 68 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements purely by going over specs. The visual here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX200 IS and Z990.
All in all, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs although you may want to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The older SX200 IS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX200 IS vs Kodak Z990 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Kodak |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Kodak EasyShare Z990 |
Also called | - | EasyShare Max |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-05-14 | 2011-01-04 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 0cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 8.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 lbs) | 445g (0.98 lbs) |
Dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NB-5L | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $329 | $299 |